Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #47863
| References | <mailman.3001.1370909708.3114.python-list@python.org> <dffd70ad-4e9a-45cd-914b-7f1388ded5a2@a9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com> <51b69332$0$29997$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-12 17:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers |
| From | Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3143.1371081895.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
>> This has caused more trouble than it has solved. > > I take it you have never programmed in a programming language with a > single, flat, global namespace? :-) Hey, the purpose a programming language (i.e. a language which has a consistent lexical specification), is to provide some modicum of structure. Yes, that implies that you're implicitly following a language designers tacit philosophy (their "ObjectArchitecture") for relating data to computers, but that's fine. People always have the option of going back to assembly and starting over. > Apart from Erlang, got any other examples? Because it seems to me that in > languages with nested scopes or namespaces, shadowing higher levels is > exactly the right thing to do. Really? >>> int="five" >>> [int(i) for i in ["1","2","3"]] TypeError: str is not callable Now how are you going to get the original int type back? > Certainly it would be a PITA, and defeat > the purpose of having nested scopes, if inner names had to be globally > unique. Wouldn't it be absolutely horrible if adding a global variable > "foo"[1] suddenly meant that all your functions that used "foo" as a > local variable stopped working? Not necessarily, but this is what I'm talking about in defining a ObjectArchitecture (or in some circles a "type system"). -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-10 20:14 -0400
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 19:36 -0700
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-11 03:02 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-10 20:30 -0700
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-11 05:52 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 17:20 +1000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 13:57 +1000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:55 +0300
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 17:04 -0700
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-13 01:01 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-13 10:08 +1000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-13 01:08 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-13 11:30 +1000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-06-12 19:18 -0500
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-13 10:33 +1000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-06-12 17:30 -0700
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-11 02:56 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-11 02:06 -0400
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 08:22 -0700
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-11 16:59 +0000
Re: "Don't rebind built-in names*" - it confuses readers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 03:32 +1000
csiph-web