Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26349
| Date | 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| References | (1 earlier) <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org> <roy-DBE17E.06593701082012@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2819.1343819248.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
>> The most effective IPC is usually through shared memory. But there is no >> OS independent standard Python module that can communicate over shared >> memory. > It's true that shared memory is faster than serializing objects over a > TCP connection. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine anything > written in Python where you would notice the difference. Well, except in response times. ;-) The TCP stack likes to wait after you call send() on a socket. Yes, you can use setsockopt/TCP_NOWAIT, but my experience is that response times with TCP can be long, especially when you have to do many request-response pairs. It also depends on the protocol design - if you can reduce the number of request-response pairs then it helps a lot.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 10:19 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 06:59 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:26 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 15:07 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 14:16 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:32 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 19:48 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-02 14:29 +0000
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-02 13:21 -0400
Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:42 +0200
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 16:24 +0100
csiph-web