Re: Question about 'iterable cursors'

From	Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: Question about 'iterable cursors'
Date	2011-11-08 16:29 +1100
References	<mailman.2460.1320569710.27778.python-list@python.org> <87pqh54nmh.fsf@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> <j95kld$ng4$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.2472.1320609864.27778.python-list@python.org> <4eb77503$0$1692$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2533.1320730182.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/07/2011 05:04 PM, John Nagle wrote:
> Realize that SQLite is not a high-performance multi-user database.
> You use SQLite to store your browser preferences, not your customer
> database.

I agree with SQLite is not multi-user; I disagree that SQLite is not a 
high-performance database. In single user cases, SQLite should far 
outperform a client-server-based database engine since it doesn't have 
the client-server overhead.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Question about 'iterable cursors' "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2011-11-06 10:54 +0200
  Re: Question about 'iterable cursors' Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-11-06 10:16 +0100
    Re: Question about 'iterable cursors' "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2011-11-06 11:39 +0200
    Re: Question about 'iterable cursors' Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-06 12:04 -0800
      Re: Question about 'iterable cursors' John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-11-06 22:04 -0800
        Re: Question about 'iterable cursors' Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 16:29 +1100

csiph-web