Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed10.multikabel.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'disagree': 0.07; 'received:edu.au': 0.07; 'sqlite': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'preferences,': 0.16; 'subject:iterable': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'subject:Question': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'realize': 0.34; 'agree': 0.34; 'received:au': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.37; 'cases,': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'far': 0.40; 'store': 0.40; 'user': 0.40; 'your': 0.61; 'john': 0.62; 'browser': 0.62; 'customer': 0.65; 'engine': 0.71; 'database.': 0.73; 'overhead.': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question about 'iterable cursors'
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:29:25 +1100
References: <mailman.2460.1320569710.27778.python-list@python.org>	<87pqh54nmh.fsf@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>	<j95kld$ng4$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.2472.1320609864.27778.python-list@python.org> <4eb77503$0$1692$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpmon.mq.edu.au
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
In-Reply-To: <4eb77503$0$1692$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2533.1320730182.27778.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 10
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1320730182 news.xs4all.nl 6933 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40655
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15455

On 11/07/2011 05:04 PM, John Nagle wrote:
> Realize that SQLite is not a high-performance multi-user database.
> You use SQLite to store your browser preferences, not your customer
> database.

I agree with SQLite is not multi-user; I disagree that SQLite is not a 
high-performance database. In single user cases, SQLite should far 
outperform a client-server-based database engine since it doesn't have 
the client-server overhead.