Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46411
| Subject | Re: The state of pySerial |
|---|---|
| From | William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> |
| Date | 2013-05-29 16:00 -0400 |
| References | <CAGVx7UVrvZUzwYAyj8Yj+1wOm9q_jf_UDwYLgx2u1w+Vv1-rLQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2379.1369861273.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On May 29, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all. > > pySerial is probably "the solution" for serial port programming. > Physical serial port is dead on PC but USB-to-Serial give it a second > life. Serial port stuff won't interest end users at all. But it is > still used in the EE world and so on. Arduino uses it to upload > programs. Sensors may use serial port to communicate with PC. GSM > Modem also uses serial port to communicate with PC. > > Unforunately, pySerial project doesn't seem to have a good state. I > find pySerial + Python 3.3 broken on my machine (Python 2.7 is OK) . > There are unanswered outstanding bugs, PyPI page has 2.6 while SF > homepage still gives 2.5. > > Any idea? > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list Let me add another vote/request for pySerial support. I've been using it with python 2.7 on OS-X, unaware that there wasn't a path forward to python 3.x. If an external sensor absolutely positively has to be readable, then RS-232 is the only way to go. USB interfaces can and do lock up if recovery from a power failure puts power on the external side before the computer has finished initializing the CPU side. RS-232, bless its primitive heart, could care less. Thanks, Bill
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The state of pySerial William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-05-29 16:00 -0400
csiph-web