Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46412
| From | Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? |
| Date | 2013-05-29 21:01 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ko5qbe$816$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <CAGVx7UWXAFHSHq37Ep-Vk=cM2wYrEGHSUhNc8s43bCvj_VcVow@mail.gmail.com> <CAGVx7UXHfdMSL18q1bz4OWyz_rYirogJa7++VarBfDSd0BReQw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2376.1369853687.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, 30 May 2013 04:54:44 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: <snip> > GUIs and databasing are two of the areas where I > think Python's standard library could stand to be improved a bit. > There are definitely some rough edges there. Dunno what you mean about "standard library", but I'm very happy with wxPython and psycopg2 for GUIs and databasing respectively.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 04:54 +1000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-05-29 21:01 +0000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 13:57 +1000
csiph-web