Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31403
| References | <DUB117-W80EE2285B5E415AA14B5B9919F0@phx.gbl> <mailman.2203.1350308439.27098.python-list@python.org> <8b51748d-0517-4b1d-a0a6-e8fa06dd4b68@r10g2000pbd.googlegroups.com> <DUB117-W741B72171E7BBFB4B07D7791700@phx.gbl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-16 07:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fastest web framework |
| From | Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2278.1350396527.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Let me say right off the bat that I've taken a brief look through the code and documentation and found that I wouldn't mind trying it out for personal projects. So, the intention here is not to slag the framework. > Performance and effectivity are related metrics. Longer feature list can not explain why it less effective. An answer to effectivity question might be related to: > - code quality (we have PEP8) Any static code analysis such as pylint or pyflakes? > - architectural decisions taken What (sample of) decisions? How do they differ from other frameworks? How will they make my life better? > - core team experience Not sure this is entirely relevant (imho). Engineers with great experience on paper may still make poor decisions and output shoddy work. Conversely, a new grad (or weekend hacker) may have a solid understanding and output amazing work. > - historical path, etc. What does this mean? > There is a problem with 3rd party code... it should evolve with framework... so good one become a part of it. 3rd party UI things are good, until you start `customize` them, patch, workaround, etc. This is where pain come from. However, there are exceptions. Can you name few? [Disclaimer: personal opinion] I couldn't disagree more. A good framework provides the glue for various subsystems to work amazingly well together. Perhaps this is why I'm drawn to micro-frameworks and the likes of Pyramid. No assumptions are made about *how* I'm going to use the framework. Modularity is good. Do one thing and do it *very* well. Caching? Use beaker. ORM? Use SQLAlchemy. > Let me state this: "wheezy.web let you design web application to be able run it at the speed of `hello world`, even database driven one". This bothers me. It's misleading to newbies and it's just wrong. You simply *cannot* have a database driven application run at the exact same performance as a "hello world" app.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-10-15 16:39 +0300
Re: Fastest web framework alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-10-15 18:26 -0700
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-10-16 14:49 +0300
Re: Fastest web framework Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-10-16 07:08 -0700
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-10-16 17:47 +0300
Re: Fastest web framework Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-10-16 09:07 -0700
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-10-16 19:35 +0300
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-10-26 13:53 +0300
csiph-web