Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste

From	Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste
Date	2020-01-08 11:38 -0800
Message-ID	<mailman.2273.1578512358.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <c44dfb06-fad2-4b6c-0520-558cec6d25ba@case.edu> <CAKOZueuJZkPzJwRH56FwWtDDdNxxa+Zm=VZDhnJuTf5bfo2Y2w@mail.gmail.com> <edc24625-1e32-5571-2728-2744e3b7f6ca@case.edu> <CAKOZueubcO2RdOZuevzF+waBBcnfnVgd74LJU6P2bbwtEewOXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOZuet-7Tskn-ZDOsrmuRYM16AvqN+1OfJ38bvmaGCYZFAAvw@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:20 PM Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:36 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/23/19 7:32 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:37 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 1/9/19 2:39 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > >>> Any chance we can revive this patch now that Bash 5 is out? (The patch
> > >>> itself, of course, would need to be rebased.)
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I plan to.
> > >
> > > Have you had a chance to look at the patch?
> >
> > Sorry, I have not. I need a bigger chunk of time than I've had available
> > to figure out the intent of the patches, and whether they're a good idea
> > to include in readline, before looking closely at the code.
>
> I've had a people tell me that this patch is very useful for helping
> them understand editing operations and pasting. I sent this patch over
> a year and a half ago. Should I expect another year and a half of
> pinging this thread? :-)

Is there anything I can do to get this patch looked at?

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> - 2020-01-08 11:38 -0800

csiph-web