Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-01-08 11:38 -0800 |
| Last post | 2020-01-08 11:38 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> - 2020-01-08 11:38 -0800
| From | Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-08 11:38 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2273.1578512358.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:20 PM Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:36 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > > > > On 9/23/19 7:32 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:37 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 1/9/19 2:39 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > >>> Any chance we can revive this patch now that Bash 5 is out? (The patch > > >>> itself, of course, would need to be rebased.) > > >> > > >> Yes, I plan to. > > > > > > Have you had a chance to look at the patch? > > > > Sorry, I have not. I need a bigger chunk of time than I've had available > > to figure out the intent of the patches, and whether they're a good idea > > to include in readline, before looking closely at the code. > > I've had a people tell me that this patch is very useful for helping > them understand editing operations and pasting. I sent this patch over > a year and a half ago. Should I expect another year and a half of > pinging this thread? :-) Is there anything I can do to get this patch looked at?
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web