Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #11255
| Date | 2011-08-12 09:10 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | przemolicc@poczta.fm |
| Subject | Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? |
| References | (4 earlier) <20110811064030.GB4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmqiiKcT7Zg-XkbrQ4r-keU9+1Kj=+sEwa4xp==2EG-5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110811134613.GE4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <mailman.2180.1313070526.1164.python-list@python.org> <d3373f34-6031-43c8-887d-de8a56a74709@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2205.1313133047.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:38:32PM -0700, SigmundV wrote: > When I saw the headline I thought "oh no, not string concatenation > again... we have had scores of these thread before...", but this is a > rather interesting problem. The OP says he's not a database > developer, but why is he then fiddling with internal database > operations? Wouldn't it be better to go back to the database > developers and have them look into parallel processing. I'm sure that > Oracle databases can do parallel processing by now... :-) Good question but I try to explain what motivates me to do it. First reason (I think the most important :-) ) is that I want to learn something new - I am new to python (I am unix/storage sysadmin but with programming background so python was a natural choice for more complicated sysadmin tasks). Another reason is that our server (and I am responsible for it) has many, many but slow cores (as I had written before). It means that parallelization of operations is obvious - the developer is not keen to spent much time on it (she is busy) - and for me this is something new (among some boring daily tasks ... ;-) ) and fresh :-) Another intention is to get some more knowledge about parallelization: how to divide some task into subtasks, what is the most optimal way to do it, etc And the last reason is that I love performance tuning :-) Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Zmyslowa bielizna? U nas ja znajdziesz! http://linkint.pl/f29fe
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 14:48 +0100
Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 14:38 -0700
Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-12 09:10 +0200
Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 09:09 -0700
csiph-web