Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

References	(2 earlier) <20110810133146.GE5045@host.pgf.com.pl> <j1ub3q$65c$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110811064030.GB4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmqiiKcT7Zg-XkbrQ4r-keU9+1Kj=+sEwa4xp==2EG-5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110811134613.GE4990@host.pgf.com.pl>
Date	2011-08-11 14:48 +0100
Subject	Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2180.1313070526.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM,  <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
> This is the way I am going to use.
> But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ?
>

List of strings. Take it straight from your Oracle interface and work
with it directly.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 14:48 +0100
  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 14:38 -0700
    Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-12 09:10 +0200
      Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 09:09 -0700

csiph-web