Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #53878
| Subject | Re: Can I trust downloading Python? |
|---|---|
| From | William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> |
| Date | 2013-09-09 12:40 -0400 |
| References | (3 earlier) <XsSdnZfDdPBCPbHPnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <mailman.156.1378658357.5461.python-list@python.org> <522d97e1$0$29893$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <522DAABA.6040307@gmail.com> <522DF5FA.5090202@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.185.1378744855.5461.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2013 05:02 AM, Anthony Papillion wrote: >> But (and this is stepping into *really* paranoid territory here. But >> maybe not beyond the realm of possibility) it would not be so hard to >> compromise compilers at the chip level. If the NSA were to strike an >> agreement with, say, Intel so that every time a compiler ran on the >> system, secret code was discreetly inserted into the binary, it would be >> nearly impossible to detect and a very elegant solution to a tough problem. > > Indeed it is really paranoid territory, but now doesn't seem quite as > far fetched as one originally thought a few years ago! We'll still > trust (we have to; we have no other choice), but the level of trust in > computers in general has certainly gone down a notch and will never > quite be the same. > > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list I think that is pretty far fetched. It requires recognition that a compiler is being compiled. I'd be REALLY surprised if there were a unique sequence of hardware instructions that was common across every possible compiler (current and future) and which wouldn't (couldn't) exist in arbitrary non-compiller execution, which could be used to trigger insertion of a backdoor. -Bill
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-09-07 21:04 -0600
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-08 12:32 +0000
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? "Charles Hottel" <chottel@earthlink.net> - 2013-09-08 12:08 -0400
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-09-09 02:39 +1000
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-09 09:41 +0000
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Anthony Papillion <papillion@gmail.com> - 2013-09-09 06:02 -0500
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-09-09 10:23 -0600
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-09-09 12:40 -0400
Re: Can I trust downloading Python? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-09-09 10:44 -0600
csiph-web