Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<kwpolska@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.108
X-Spam-Level	*
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.79; 'S': 0.01; 'elegant': 0.07; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'galaxy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'this?': 0.23; 'cc:20': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:20': 0.24; '>': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'skip:\xc2 10': 0.60; 'subject:more': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'subject:there': 0.68; '8bit%:100': 0.72; 'subject:this': 0.83; '2015': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kGPsf7ZDl59YbMn6UvnTU14WeYIE8yw/xy4wK5zg9Vw=; b=kNfcIMOHV6FNuB7WJ3f79twmBwzzF3J5oJFyoCHXUV4F1akB5e1buAASy5zg6lo9v6 UFqHtvwsQnHnWAEvoqSPjZwRlzdNknwiSmfJrooOk4glxn0r9kwGevZ6wQrqvrGliQRu 2hsZX/eH+8Rkm9jXB7wInvYAFWZCeeG6w04sxD6paDkAXvJsqHN4wsrHDk8RkpujrMhR z4M+DpTOk7/FPv4ChpynYHJibDabmBeiBAdA4U8xTmuLocPmLgvTVQHNkg0gZXXeO2oD aue9oBQ99KikVo1QSrawM6Is6q8tw4HbEpXEBkkQMgqo2KgfOGfBmqlpxzGpn53cYtsO r1DA==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.112.85.11 with SMTP id d11mr1579668lbz.100.1422364810054; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:20:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<ma8311$q4c$1@ger.gmane.org>
References	<ma8311$q4c$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:20:10 +0100
Subject	Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
From	Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>
To	Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Content-Type	multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11345ed63e9242050da21d56
Cc	python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.18171.1422364818.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	36
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1422364818 news.xs4all.nl 2833 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42253
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:84643

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Jan 27, 2015 2:16 PM, "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
>
> for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:

for x in seq:
    if some_predicate:
        do_something_to(x)

-- 
Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
Sent from my Galaxy S3.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 14:20 +0100
  Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> - 2015-01-27 09:49 -0800
    Re: Is there a more elegant way to spell this? Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-01-27 10:27 -0800

csiph-web