Re: Decimals and other numbers

References	<CABicbJK-5izGtet8BsS1Yqx+6AHMX7gLU4zYjjt5jULJXNVipA@mail.gmail.com> <54AF405C.6020609@davea.name> <mailman.17501.1420772593.18130.python-list@python.org> <54af9612$0$12995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CABicbJLjogfGFgz5zn1v-y-nQ0QJzpfrRR_ScEm7jEtiNdrMXg@mail.gmail.com>
From	Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date	2015-01-09 01:11 -0800
Subject	Re: Decimals and other numbers
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.17515.1420795186.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
<jeanpierreda@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Arguably, *integer* 0**0 could be zero, on the basis that you can't take
>> limits of integer-valued quantities, and zero times itself zero times
>> surely has to be zero.

I should have responded in more detail here, sorry.

If you aren't performing any multiplication, why does it matter what
numbers you are "multiplying"? Doing no multiplications of five is the
same as doing no multiplications of two is the same as doing no
multiplications of... 0.

You can define it to be 0 but only if you are multiplying an empty bag
of zeroes, but it's hard to imagine what makes an empty bag of zeroes
different from an empty bag of fives. It really surely is *not* the
case.

Obviously, this kind of ridiculousness comes naturally to Java and C++
programmers, with their statically typed collections. It's no surprise
that's where the Decimal spec came from. ;)

-- Devin

Thread

Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 19:02 -0800
  Re: Decimals and other numbers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 09:28 +0200
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 18:37 +1100
      Re: Decimals and other numbers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 11:31 +0200
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-01-09 02:49 -0500
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 00:51 -0800
      Re: Decimals and other numbers Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-01-09 11:07 +0200
        [OT] x**y == y**x Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-01-09 17:46 +0000
          Re: [OT] x**y == y**x Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 23:41 +0200
            Re: [OT] x**y == y**x Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-01-10 16:57 +0000
  Re: Decimals and other numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-09 19:49 +1100
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 00:58 -0800
      Re: Decimals and other numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-09 21:20 +1100
        Re: Decimals and other numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 21:39 +1100
          Re: Decimals and other numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-09 23:24 +1100
            Re: Decimals and other numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 23:34 +1100
        Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 17:25 -0800
        Re: Decimals and other numbers Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-01-10 16:08 +1300
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 01:11 -0800
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 11:34 +0200
      Re: Decimals and other numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-01-09 22:03 +1100
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-01-09 11:44 +0200
    Re: Decimals and other numbers Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-01-10 16:05 +1300
      Re: Decimals and other numbers Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2015-01-09 19:57 -0800

csiph-web