Return-Path: <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.019
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '*not*': 0.07; 'statically': 0.07; 'naturally': 0.09; 'spec': 0.09; 'typed': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'collections.': 0.16; 'obviously,': 0.16; 'programmers,': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'zero,': 0.16; 'zero.': 0.16; 'zeroes': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "aren't": 0.24; 'case.': 0.24; 'java': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'performing': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'decimal': 0.31; 'responded': 0.31; 'subject:numbers': 0.31; 'subject:other': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'c++': 0.36; 'surely': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'does': 0.39; 'itself': 0.39; 'numbers': 0.61; 'matter': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'kind': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'bag': 0.74; 'surprise': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'multiplying': 0.84; 'sorry.': 0.91; 'from.': 0.93; 'imagine': 0.93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=c1vwUGP/y+r2s4Fq7hGHKn3B5WRD2x9z6uV/7LJFgaU=; b=kMaHCs+KKPGLrilvWoMjeiwOcSh+p9SFUGnTqDGsNubZfNAf1FhE0PFA2AXOXXx+eX yhBFTpHGm+gqdqm01eIM6BhNVLpLvqkffawq/RtbgGRCi7JTbYtICpXsCe9N1NmguVE5 dz/iNqmOQv8AnFcp8GOqIo3ZOFzIu8D60mvB00XFD+cFTKkhj37im8Vq1MSlZ8Q+zafo HwhWxEP41ypsuvydRQT5Ab2+/oNoKbCtGc3qxWi96J2fDSnIA2p8iHUIT5MBk7hWsTUH hy4WKOACA7k3lTCq3E0flev20gQxHnTHPdaV8BEIRjVx5lMicWla3ndVnxiQbcqrgklM WL8g==
X-Received: by 10.140.21.229 with SMTP id 92mr23368453qgl.33.1420794722295; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 01:12:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABicbJLjogfGFgz5zn1v-y-nQ0QJzpfrRR_ScEm7jEtiNdrMXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABicbJK-5izGtet8BsS1Yqx+6AHMX7gLU4zYjjt5jULJXNVipA@mail.gmail.com> <54AF405C.6020609@davea.name> <mailman.17501.1420772593.18130.python-list@python.org> <54af9612$0$12995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CABicbJLjogfGFgz5zn1v-y-nQ0QJzpfrRR_ScEm7jEtiNdrMXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 01:11:21 -0800
Subject: Re: Decimals and other numbers
To: "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "comp.lang.python" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.17515.1420795186.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1420795186 news.xs4all.nl 2966 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54383
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:83417

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
<jeanpierreda@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Arguably, *integer* 0**0 could be zero, on the basis that you can't take
>> limits of integer-valued quantities, and zero times itself zero times
>> surely has to be zero.

I should have responded in more detail here, sorry.

If you aren't performing any multiplication, why does it matter what
numbers you are "multiplying"? Doing no multiplications of five is the
same as doing no multiplications of two is the same as doing no
multiplications of... 0.

You can define it to be 0 but only if you are multiplying an empty bag
of zeroes, but it's hard to imagine what makes an empty bag of zeroes
different from an empty bag of fives. It really surely is *not* the
case.

Obviously, this kind of ridiculousness comes naturally to Java and C++
programmers, with their statically typed collections. It's no surprise
that's where the Decimal spec came from. ;)

-- Devin