Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38687
| References | <5tuhh8pqccqhkhdfad4nrudd9ad4ptoo82@4ax.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-11 06:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? |
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1653.1360592885.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Feb 11, 2013 6:16 AM, "Gilles" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > > Hello > > I read this article... > > "Why is WSGI deployment under FASTCGI so painful?" > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2011/09/why-is-wsgi-deployment-under-fastcgi-so.html > > ... and was wondering what better alternative is available to run > Python web scripts? If you want to stick with Apache, mod_wsgi is the obvious alternative. > Someone recommends nginx + uWSGI.What do you think? We use that combination at my workplace, and it works well.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-02-11 15:11 +0100 Re: Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-02-11 06:27 -0800
csiph-web