Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38685 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-11 15:11 +0100 |
| Last post | 2013-02-11 06:27 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-02-11 15:11 +0100
Re: Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-02-11 06:27 -0800
| From | Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-11 15:11 +0100 |
| Subject | Alternative to Apache+mod_fcgid+Flup? |
| Message-ID | <5tuhh8pqccqhkhdfad4nrudd9ad4ptoo82@4ax.com> |
Hello I read this article... "Why is WSGI deployment under FASTCGI so painful?" http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2011/09/why-is-wsgi-deployment-under-fastcgi-so.html ... and was wondering what better alternative is available to run Python web scripts? Someone recommends nginx + uWSGI.What do you think? Thank you.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-11 06:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1653.1360592885.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #38685 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Feb 11, 2013 6:16 AM, "Gilles" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > > Hello > > I read this article... > > "Why is WSGI deployment under FASTCGI so painful?" > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2011/09/why-is-wsgi-deployment-under-fastcgi-so.html > > ... and was wondering what better alternative is available to run > Python web scripts? If you want to stick with Apache, mod_wsgi is the obvious alternative. > Someone recommends nginx + uWSGI.What do you think? We use that combination at my workplace, and it works well.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web