Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #90005
| Date | 2015-05-05 17:55 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons |
| References | (4 earlier) <55490FAE.8070501@davea.name> <CALwzidmuhD0HhAZKRGMbgEgVVHf05_3pw=+o2JyAwWdiOtcNNA@mail.gmail.com> <55492F55.1020105@davea.name> <CALwzid=ZX69d3p=C96qksT0DRD+mdm5eeA9zUq0VtcW1vqT0uw@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzid=gtNo3sbg2BP_ycUh+X52M5bcjGMXvzsNgHyw3k-crDg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.144.1430862924.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 05/05/2015 05:39 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote:
>>> def loop(func, funcname, arg):
>>> start = time.time()
>>> for i in range(repeats):
>>> func(arg, True)
>>> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start))
>>>
>>> start = time.time()
>>> for i in range(repeats):
>>> func(arg)
>>> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start))
>>
>> Note that you're explicitly passing True in one case but leaving the
>> default in the other. I don't know whether that might be responsible
>> for the difference you're seeing.
>
> I don't think that's the cause, but I do think that it has something
> to do with the way the timing is being run. When I run your loop
> function, I do observe the difference. If I reverse the order so that
> the False case is tested first, I observe the opposite. That is, the
> slower case is consistently the one that is timed *first* in the loop
> function, regardless of which case that is.
>
I created two functions and called them with Timeit(), and the
difference is now below 3%
And when I take your lead and double the loop() function so it runs each
test twice, I get steadily decreasing numbers.
I think all of this has been noise caused by the caching of objects
including function objects. I was surprised by this, as the loops are
small enough I'd figure the function object would be fully cached the
first time it was called.
--
DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 16:20 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 17:12 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 08:47 -0700
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 18:18 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 14:45 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 21:42 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 12:57 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 14:03 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 14:30 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-05 16:46 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 23:12 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-05 19:22 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 17:00 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 15:23 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 11:27 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 23:58 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 17:08 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 10:17 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-06 21:23 +0100
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 15:39 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 17:55 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 12:19 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 14:05 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 16:26 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 09:12 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-05-07 03:16 +0000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 23:55 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 10:22 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 08:12 -0700
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-06 17:36 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 16:23 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-07 11:14 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-07 19:38 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 09:47 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 10:24 -0700
csiph-web