Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #90060
| From | Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons |
| Date | 2015-05-06 17:36 +0200 |
| Organization | Université de Strasbourg |
| Message-ID | <87pp6doh09.fsf@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <87h9rvm576.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <55499304$0$12978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5549b41f$0$12927$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <8761853fkd.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> |
Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes: > Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> writes: >> Multiplying upwards seems to be more expensive than multiplying >> downwards... I can only guess that it has something to do with the way >> multiplication is implemented, or perhaps the memory management >> involved, or something. Who the hell knows? > > It seems pretty natural if multiplication uses the obvious > quadratic-time pencil and paper algorithm. The cost of multiplying m*n > is basically w(m)*w(n) where w(x) is the width of x in machine words. > So for factorial where m is the counter and n is the running product, > w(m) is always 1 while w(n) is basically log2(n!). From > > from math import log > def xfac(seq): > cost = logfac = 0.0 > for i in seq: > logfac += log(i,2) > cost += logfac > return cost > > def upward(n): return xfac(xrange(1,n+1)) > def downward(n): return xfac(xrange(n,1,-1)) > > print upward(40000),downward(40000) > > I get: 10499542692.6 11652843833.5 > > A lower number for upward than downward. The difference isn't as large > as your timings, but I think it still gives some explanation of the > effect. Yes, plus the time for memory allocation. Since the code uses "r *= ...", space is reallocated when the result doesn't fit. The new size is probably proportional to the current (insufficient) size. This means that overall, you'll need fewer reallocations, because allocations are made in bigger chunks. -- Alain.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-02 16:20 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 17:12 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 08:47 -0700
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 18:18 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 14:45 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 21:42 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 12:57 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 14:03 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 14:30 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-05 16:46 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 23:12 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-05 19:22 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 17:00 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 15:23 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 11:27 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 23:58 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 17:08 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 10:17 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-06 21:23 +0100
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 15:39 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 17:55 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 12:19 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 14:05 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-06 16:26 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 09:12 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2015-05-07 03:16 +0000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 23:55 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 10:22 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 08:12 -0700
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-06 17:36 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-06 16:23 -0400
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2015-05-07 11:14 +0200
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-07 19:38 +1000
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-06 09:47 -0600
Re: Throw the cat among the pigeons Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-06 10:24 -0700
csiph-web