Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15548
| From | sunnycemetery@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Binding Containing Escape Key Fails to Escape History Search |
| Date | 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.142.1572561180.13325.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <20191022025648.GA19869@midnight> <6fcf6dd7-a0b5-8868-797c-cefbcc3346a2@case.edu> <20191031223246.GA8439@midnight> |
On 2019-10-30 13:40, Chet Ramey wrote: > Incremental search doesn't do macro translation like that. I see. Is this considered a shortcoming? Being able to bind \ef and Alt+f to different commands in various programs is useful, but without bash coming along for the ride, I might have to go back to XTerm*altSendsEscape. This is, of course, only one usage case.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Binding Containing Escape Key Fails to Escape History Search sunnycemetery@gmail.com - 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400
csiph-web