Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | sunnycemetery@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400 |
| Last post | 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Binding Containing Escape Key Fails to Escape History Search sunnycemetery@gmail.com - 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400
| From | sunnycemetery@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-10-31 18:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Binding Containing Escape Key Fails to Escape History Search |
| Message-ID | <mailman.142.1572561180.13325.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 2019-10-30 13:40, Chet Ramey wrote: > Incremental search doesn't do macro translation like that. I see. Is this considered a shortcoming? Being able to bind \ef and Alt+f to different commands in various programs is useful, but without bash coming along for the ride, I might have to go back to XTerm*altSendsEscape. This is, of course, only one usage case.
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web