Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #42814

Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?

Date 2013-04-05 13:50 +0100
From Ian Foote <ian@feete.org>
Subject Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?
References <6ac24546-6cc6-4a01-9fa6-3b52d64484e3@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.138.1365166263.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 05/04/13 03:29, John Ladasky wrote:
> I'm revisiting a project that I haven't touched in over a year.  It was written in Python 2.6, and executed on 32-bit Ubuntu 10.10.  I experienced a 20% performance increase when I used Psyco, because I had a computationally-intensive routine which occupied most of my CPU cycles, and always received the same data type.  (Multiprocessing also helped, and I was using that too.)
>
> I have now migrated to a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10.1, and Python 3.3.  I would rather not revert to my older configuration.  That being said, it would appear from my initial reading that 1) Psyco is considered obsolete and is no longer maintained, 2) Psyco is being superseded by PyPy, 3) PyPy doesn't support Python 3.x, or 64-bit optimizations.
>
> Do I understand all that correctly?
>
> I guess I can live with the 20% slower execution, but sometimes my code would run for three solid days...
>

Pypy is working on porting to python 3. They are accepting donations: 
http://pypy.org/py3donate.html

Regards,
Ian F

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-04 19:29 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-04-05 03:39 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 14:37 -0400
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:23 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:27 +1100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:49 +1100
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 11:32 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
          Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 13:05 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:46 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? ptb <petertbrady@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 05:18 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-04-05 13:50 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:27 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 08:45 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-04-06 21:41 +0200

csiph-web