Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42789
| Date | 2013-04-05 03:39 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| Subject | Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? |
| References | <6ac24546-6cc6-4a01-9fa6-3b52d64484e3@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.121.1365129540.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 05/04/2013 03:29, John Ladasky wrote: > I'm revisiting a project that I haven't touched in over a year. It > was written in Python 2.6, and executed on 32-bit Ubuntu 10.10. I > experienced a 20% performance increase when I used Psyco, because I > had a computationally-intensive routine which occupied most of my CPU > cycles, and always received the same data type. (Multiprocessing > also helped, and I was using that too.) > > I have now migrated to a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10.1, and Python 3.3. I > would rather not revert to my older configuration. That being said, > it would appear from my initial reading that 1) Psyco is considered > obsolete and is no longer maintained, 2) Psyco is being superseded by > PyPy, 3) PyPy doesn't support Python 3.x, or 64-bit optimizations. > > Do I understand all that correctly? > > I guess I can live with the 20% slower execution, but sometimes my > code would run for three solid days... > Have you looked at Cython? Not quite the same, but still...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-04 19:29 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-04-05 03:39 +0100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 14:37 -0400
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:23 +0100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:27 +1100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:49 +1100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 11:32 -0600
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 13:05 -0600
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:46 +0100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? ptb <petertbrady@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 05:18 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-04-05 13:50 +0100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:27 +0100
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 08:45 -0700
Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-04-06 21:41 +0200
csiph-web