Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76741
| References | <CAKUKWzmnnrpm-9SVNAFu3G9vYf2w0ewAhnGeOge8B2NsDujamQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrO7fER7Wjgo6qNO9qHNJgkJ7Y3BFWBf1L=t-bOv4JV7w@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-21 17:26 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| From | David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13253.1408635277.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Thank you for the interesting answers. Just a clarification. Actually for the scope of this question, I consider C and C++ quite different. At least when they are "properly" used (eg, you could use C++ as a better C, but this is not C++ in its full glory). In my opinion, if all that you want is performance, coding critical parts in C or Frotran should be enough. Or even Cython. As far as the fraction of code that turns out to be critical is relatively small. But C++ is a monster compared to C. And I realize it requires a huge amount of time and practice to master it. The question is whether is it worth as a generic approach or not (*). I tend to think that it isn't that useful. Best, David (*) as some of you already mentioned, you could need C++ for joining a specific project, for instance. But that would not imply anything about how well suited is C++ for that particular project.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python vs C++ David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 17:26 +0200
csiph-web