Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76742
| Date | 2014-08-21 09:51 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| References | <CAKUKWzmnnrpm-9SVNAFu3G9vYf2w0ewAhnGeOge8B2NsDujamQ@mail.gmail.com> <53F5F682.3010208@arskom.com.tr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13254.1408636310.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 08/21/2014 07:39 AM, Burak Arslan wrote: > For my day job, I chose Qt on C++ for a classic desktop app that needs > to be deployed on Windows (among other platforms) with an installation > package that is as small as possible. > > All I need to do deployment-wise is to create an NSIS script putting a > couple of DLL's and my executable in a folder in %ProgramFiles% and a > shortcutin start menu. The full package is 5 megs and the update archive > is pushing half a megabyte. > > I was also back to C++ after a number of years of exclusive web dev with > Python and Javascript. C++11 is just *sweet*, I'd never imagined I'd > enjoy doing non-computer-sciencey work with C++. Definitely second the idea of using Qt and C++ to build something. Qt is natively C++, so it's most at home there. Qt works fine in other languages, like Python, but it's not a perfect fit there because Qt is based on the C++ object model.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python vs C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 09:51 -0600
csiph-web