Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38123
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: __getattr__ Confusion |
| Date | 2013-02-04 15:15 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <095a0432-f8a4-40b4-96ed-1588896fba66@googlegroups.com> <510f3a91$0$29866$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <863c89b0-2125-4525-8ad8-1111b0a6beae@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1322.1359987291.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Saul Spatz wrote: > Now I have another question. If dunder methods are looked up only in the > class, not the instance, why did defining __nonzero__ the way I did work? > Shouldn't I have had to define it with a def? Is __nonzero__ a special > case? Unfortunately the situation is a bit more complex. Classic classes (like Tkinter.Frame) behave differently from newstyle classes (subclasses of object): >>> def nz(): ... print "nonzero" ... return 0 ... >>> class Classic: pass ... >>> c = Classic() >>> c.__nonzero__ = nz >>> not c nonzero True >>> class New(object): pass ... >>> n = New() >>> n.__nonzero__ = nz >>> not n False So Steven is wrong here. > Shouldn't I have had to define it with a def? If you mean as opposed to a lambda, there is no difference between f = lambda ... and def f(...): ... other than that the last one gives you a nice name in a traceback.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
__getattr__ Confusion Saul Spatz <saul.spatz@gmail.com> - 2013-02-03 17:08 -0800
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 12:28 +1100
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-03 21:47 -0500
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-04 04:35 +0000
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Saul Spatz <saul.spatz@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 05:44 -0800
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-04 15:15 +0100
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-05 01:46 +1100
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Saul Spatz <saul.spatz@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 09:29 -0800
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-04 19:23 +0100
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 12:00 +1100
Re: __getattr__ Confusion Saul Spatz <saul.spatz@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 09:29 -0800
csiph-web