Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #35453
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Parsing files in python |
| Date | 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500 |
| References | <20121223171955.GB32535@ifeobi.illom.net> <kb8c6k$kb7$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmpUs46to1OdcGc_j76H=KrNHnzyS=-9i6B_2FNJGDywaw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1251.1356348593.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 12/23/2012 11:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > But other than that, yes, Python's a good choice for this. (I find it > amusing how I said "yeah, good idea to make a DSL, I wonder if you can > capitalize on Python" and you said "don't make a DSL, maybe you can > capitalize on Python" - opposite opening argument, same conclusion and > recommendation.) I am aware that every substantial module, let alone package, defines a domain-specific extension or vocabulary. str.format and struct even have their own mini-language (which people tend to forget if not used regularly). What I meant was to not invent a domain-specific base language and syntax that is a complete replacement for an existing one. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Parsing files in python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500
csiph-web