Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #35453 > unrolled thread

Re: Parsing files in python

Started byTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
First post2012-12-24 06:29 -0500
Last post2012-12-24 06:29 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Parsing files in python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500

#35453 — Re: Parsing files in python

FromTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Date2012-12-24 06:29 -0500
SubjectRe: Parsing files in python
Message-ID<mailman.1251.1356348593.29569.python-list@python.org>
On 12/23/2012 11:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:

> But other than that, yes, Python's a good choice for this. (I find it
> amusing how I said "yeah, good idea to make a DSL, I wonder if you can
> capitalize on Python" and you said "don't make a DSL, maybe you can
> capitalize on Python" - opposite opening argument, same conclusion and
> recommendation.)

I am aware that every substantial module, let alone package, defines a 
domain-specific extension or vocabulary. str.format and struct even have 
their own mini-language (which people tend to forget if not used 
regularly). What I meant was to not invent a domain-specific base 
language and syntax that is a complete replacement for an existing one.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web