Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #35453 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Parsing files in python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 06:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Parsing files in python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1251.1356348593.29569.python-list@python.org> |
On 12/23/2012 11:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > But other than that, yes, Python's a good choice for this. (I find it > amusing how I said "yeah, good idea to make a DSL, I wonder if you can > capitalize on Python" and you said "don't make a DSL, maybe you can > capitalize on Python" - opposite opening argument, same conclusion and > recommendation.) I am aware that every substantial module, let alone package, defines a domain-specific extension or vocabulary. str.format and struct even have their own mini-language (which people tend to forget if not used regularly). What I meant was to not invent a domain-specific base language and syntax that is a complete replacement for an existing one. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web