Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9667
| Date | 2011-07-16 21:45 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <d@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! |
| References | <a26063b5-7f2a-4452-898a-6fbcbaa3ed9a@j23g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <97dcpqFdndU1@mid.individual.net> <d13c09ce-f44b-4cbe-bdd2-c997675e57da@t5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <mailman.1133.1310855718.1164.python-list@python.org> <7459fd94-1fcc-4ff2-9ea4-58f66ceac4db@k27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1149.1310867158.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 16, 5:34 pm, Fabio Zadrozny<fabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I also like the idea of override annotations and I've created a blog >> post at:http://pydev.blogspot.com/2011/06/overrideimplements-templates-on-pyd... >> to explain how I do use it (and in a way that I think should be >> standard in Python the same way it's in Java). > My hat is off to you Fabio! This is a great way to have the method > clobbering stand out. I can read this code and know EXACTLY what is > going on behind the scenes! And it also has the benefit of being very > compact as apposed to a doc-string. > > > > From Fabio's blog verbatim: > > > class A(object): > def method(self): > pass > > class B(A): > > @overrides(A.method) > def method(self): > pass > > @implements(file.write) > def write(self): > pass > > Just one small change. Change those @ signs to #, and you've got a deal. Then make a minor change to pylint, and you have a way to enforce it. -- DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-03 15:55 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-04 20:43 +1200
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 03:30 +1000
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak@hrivnak.org> - 2011-07-10 20:31 -0400
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 19:35 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak@hrivnak.org> - 2011-07-11 00:45 -0400
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 06:42 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 00:41 +1000
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 14:46 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 18:40 +1000
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:48 -0700
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 19:34 -0300
Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-07-16 21:45 -0400
csiph-web