Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #9649

Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible!

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 3:43 am, Gregory Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>> rantingrick wrote:
>> > what concerns me is the fact that virtual methods in derived
>> > classes just blend in to the crowd.
>> > I think we really need some
>> > sort of visual cue in the form of forced syntactical notation (just
>> > like the special method underscores).
>>
>> If you're suggesting that it should be impossible to override
>> a method unless it is specially marked somehow in the base
>> class, I think that would be a bad idea.
>
> Sorry i did explain properly... No NOT marked in the BASE class but
> marked in the DERIVED class! My concerns are from a readability
> standpoint.



I also like the idea of override annotations and I've created a blog
post at: http://pydev.blogspot.com/2011/06/overrideimplements-templates-on-pydev.html
to explain how I do use it (and in a way that I think should be
standard in Python the same way it's in Java).

Cheers,

Fabio

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-03 15:55 -0700
  Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-04 20:43 +1200
    Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 10:15 -0700
      Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 03:30 +1000
      Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak@hrivnak.org> - 2011-07-10 20:31 -0400
        Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-10 19:35 -0700
          Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak@hrivnak.org> - 2011-07-11 00:45 -0400
            Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 06:42 -0700
              Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 00:41 +1000
                Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 14:46 -0700
                Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 18:40 +1000
              Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:48 -0700
      Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 19:34 -0300
        Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 15:58 -0700
          Re: Re: Virtual functions are virtually invisible! Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-07-16 21:45 -0400

csiph-web