Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #35227

Re: Strange effect with import

From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: Strange effect with import
Date 2012-12-20 22:11 +0100
Organization None
References <ajhbbnFe4q1U1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1111.1356037912.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>    I hope that this isn't a stupid question, asked already a
> hundred times, but I haven't found anything definitive on
> the problem I got bitten by. I have two Python files like
> this:
> 
> -------- S1.py ------
> import random
> import S2
> 
> class R( object ) :
>     r = random.random( )
> 
> if __name__ == "__main__" :
>     print R.r
>     S2.p( )
> 
> -------- S2.py ------
> import S1
> 
> def p( ) :
>     print S1.R.r
> 
> and my expectation was that the static variable 'r' of class
> R would be identical when accessed from S1.py and S2.py.
> Unfortunately, that isn't the case, the output is different
> (and R seems to get instantiated twice).
> 
> But when I define R in S2.py instead
> 
> -------- S1.py ------
> import S2
> 
> print S2.R.r
> S2.p( )
> 
> -------- S2.py ------
> import random
> 
> class R( object ) :
>     r = random.random( )
> 
> def p( ) :
>     print R.r
> 
> or, alternatively, if I put the defintion of class R into
> a third file which I then import from the other 2 files,
> things suddenly start to work as expected/ 

That's the correct approach.

> Can someone
> explain what's going one here? I found this a bit sur-
> prising.

You should never import your program's main module anywhere else in the 
program. When Python imports a module it looks it up by the module's name in 
the sys.modules cache. For the main script that name will be "__main__" 
regardless of the file's actual name, so a subsequent "import S2" will 
result in a cache miss and a new module instance.

Similar problems occur when there is a PYTHONPATH pointing into a package 
and you have both

import package.module

and

import module

Again you will end up with two module instances, one called 
"package.module", the other just "module".

> This is, of course, not my "real" code - it would be much
> more sensible to pass the number to the function in the
> second file as an argument - but is the smallest possinle
> program I could come up with that demonstrate the prob-
> lem. In my "real" code it's unfortunately not possible
> to pass that number to whatever is going to use it in the
>  other file, I have to simulate a kind of global variable
> shared between different files.


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Strange effect with import jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-12-20 20:39 +0000
  Re: Strange effect with import Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-12-20 15:59 -0500
  Re: Strange effect with import Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-12-20 22:11 +0100
  Re: Strange effect with import Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-20 22:13 +0000
    Re: Strange effect with import jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-12-20 22:52 +0000
      Re: Strange effect with import Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-20 19:54 -0500
        Re: Strange effect with import jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-12-21 01:12 +0000
      Re: Strange effect with import Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-12-21 01:54 +0100
        Re: Strange effect with import jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-12-21 01:25 +0000
        Re: Strange effect with import jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-12-21 15:52 +0000

csiph-web