Re: Missing stack frames?

From	Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
Subject	Re: Missing stack frames?
References	<87fvjlv22v.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <CAPTjJmqzgZnziz3+yZb-4bsYtfxT2AG5HQ9Pb3Ya8AWDW8+oHA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10724.1401941449.18130.python-list@python.org> <7xfvjkdj7k.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
Date	2014-06-05 18:23 -0700
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.10797.1402017792.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> writes:
>> Still no context before the ominous close() call. I'm very confused.
>
> close() could be getting called from a destructor as the top level
> function of a thread exits, or something like that.

Shouldn't the destructor have its own stack frame then, i.e. shouldn't
the first frame be in a __del__ function?

Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Missing stack frames? Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2014-06-04 21:10 -0700
  Re: Missing stack frames? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 22:22 -0700
    Re: Missing stack frames? Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2014-06-05 18:23 -0700

csiph-web