Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #72805

Re: Missing stack frames?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!lightspeed!lightspeed.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <Nikolaus@rath.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.034
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'preferred.': 0.05; 'context': 0.07; 'thread': 0.14; '__del__': 0.16; 'fingerprint:': 0.16; 'fruit': 0.16; 'function?': 0.16; 'gpg': 0.16; 'stack': 0.19; 'id:': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'paul': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; 'that.': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'call.': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'i.e.': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'then,': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'flies': 0.84; 'encrypted': 0.91; 'ominous': 0.91
From Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Missing stack frames?
References <87fvjlv22v.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <CAPTjJmqzgZnziz3+yZb-4bsYtfxT2AG5HQ9Pb3Ya8AWDW8+oHA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10724.1401941449.18130.python-list@python.org> <7xfvjkdj7k.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
Mail-Copies-To never
Mail-Followup-To python-list@python.org
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:23:08 -0700
In-Reply-To <7xfvjkdj7k.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (Paul Rubin's message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2014 22:22:07 -0700")
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.10797.1402017792.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1402017792 news.xs4all.nl 2882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49076
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes 3231
X-Received-Body-CRC 1924549712
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:72805

Show key headers only | View raw


Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> writes:
>> Still no context before the ominous close() call. I'm very confused.
>
> close() could be getting called from a destructor as the top level
> function of a thread exits, or something like that.

Shouldn't the destructor have its own stack frame then, i.e. shouldn't
the first frame be in a __del__ function?

Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Missing stack frames? Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2014-06-04 21:10 -0700
  Re: Missing stack frames? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 22:22 -0700
    Re: Missing stack frames? Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2014-06-05 18:23 -0700

csiph-web