Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44300

Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program

Date 2013-04-24 19:26 -0400
From Dave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Subject Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program
References <mailman.1032.1366835159.3114.python-list@python.org> <atqtpaFa3niU2@mid.individual.net> <5BC4D9D9-D757-40F3-81CA-CF4FA5C73A96@mac.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1037.1366846014.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/24/2013 05:09 PM, William Ray Wing wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-04-24, William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> wrote:
>>> When I look at the pool module, the error is occurring in
>>> get(self, timeout=None) on the line after the final else:
>>>
>>>     def get(self, timeout=None):
>>>         self.wait(timeout)
>>>         if not self._ready:
>>>             raise TimeoutError
>>>         if self._success:
>>>             return self._value
>>>         else:
>>>             raise self._value
>>
>> The code that's failing is in self.wait. Somewhere in there you
>> must be masking an exception and storing it in self._value
>> instead of letting it propogate and crash your program. This is
>> hiding the actual context.
>>
>> --
>> Neil Cerutti
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> I'm sorry, I'm not following you.  The "get" routine (and thus self.wait) is part of the "pool" module in the Python multiprocessing library.
> None of my code has a class or function named "get".
>
> -Bill
>

My question is why bother with multithreading?  Why not just do these as 
separate processes?  You said "they in no way interact with each other" 
and that's a clear clue that separate processes would be cleaner.

Without knowing anything about those libraries, I'd guess that somewhere 
they do store state in a global attribute or equivalent, and when that 
is accessed by both threads, it can crash.

Separate processes will find it much more difficult to interact, which 
is a good thing most of the time.  Further, they seem to be scheduled 
more efficiently because of the GIL, though that may not make that much 
difference when you're time-limited by network data.

-- 
DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-04-24 15:25 -0400
  Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-24 20:31 +0000
    Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2013-04-24 17:09 -0400
      Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-04-25 12:37 +0000
    Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-24 19:26 -0400
    Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-25 01:00 +0100
    Re: Finding the source of an exception in a python multiprocessing program Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-24 20:11 -0400

csiph-web