Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662587

Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics
Date	2025-04-10 08:07 +0200
Message-ID	<m5p5f6F7097U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<1832b7b12c9a5cee$977009$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <fPdJP.740908$C61.738163@fx03.ams4> <JNYB61j0p6fxAPzmEQU_1Taomt4@jntp>

Show all headers | View raw

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 23:43 schrieb Richard Hachel:
> Le 08/04/2025 à 20:22, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
> 
>> D = √((1+v/c)/(1−v/c)). 
> 
> This equation is entirely correct theoretically and completely logical 
> experimentally.
> 
> What has always amazed me, for several years now, is that I have 
> remained one of the few to fully trust it, even though the observed 
> effects can sometimes be frankly counterintuitive.
> 
> I remind you, once again, why I remain the best relativistic theorist of 
> all time (not by my own strength, because I based my work on my 
> predecessors, and I confirm that the mathematician Henri Poincaré was 
> the greatest and the true founding father of the theory); I am the only 
> one who doesn't tremble when writing what he writes:
> All the others start to tremble if I ask them how far the Earth is from 
> Stella's spacecraft, when Stella has just made its U-turn, over there, 
> at Tau Ceti, and is now traveling towards Earth at 0.8c.

Have you heard of something called 'acceleration'?

In flight they use the term 'g-force' as a measure, how fast a pilot 
could be accelerated.

Such an u-turn at 0.8 c would require to decelerate to almost zero speed 
and accelerate again.

You could try an u-turn at almost light speed, but that isn't 
recommended, because turning causes a sideways acceleration (called 
'centrifugal force') and pilots cannot withstand more than a few g.

It depends a little upon the radius of your turn. But at 0.8 that radius 
needed would be rather large.

So deceleration would be mandatory.

Unfortunately that also threatens the health of your crew, if higher 
than two or three g.

But the distance to that star should be long enough to safely 
accelerated and decelerate.

The main problem is now, that the crew wouldn't live long enough for a 
round trip.

...

TH

Thread

A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-03 07:26 +0200
  Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Random Kasamatsu Guan <atmmsat@sasmtm.jp> - 2025-04-06 15:32 +0000
    Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-07 12:03 +0200
      Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Nabor Tzarakov <kzan@zabr.ru> - 2025-04-07 13:25 +0000
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-07 20:40 +0200
          Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-08 07:58 +0200
            Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-08 21:01 +0200
              Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics ("chronons") Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 21:27 -0700
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics ("chronons") Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 21:50 -0700
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics ("chronons") Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 22:48 -0700
              Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 08:34 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-09 09:42 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 12:31 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-10 09:58 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-10 11:21 +0200
      Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-07 17:25 +0200
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Benito Grünewald <gace@tehnee.de> - 2025-04-07 17:17 +0000
          Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-08 07:57 +0200
            Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Celestino Schräder <sr@elcsdtg.de> - 2025-04-08 17:43 +0000
              Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 08:17 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Baldemar Warszawski <ims@sakiawabd.pl> - 2025-04-09 11:01 +0000
  Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-08 20:26 +0200
    Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-04-08 21:43 +0000
      Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-10 08:07 +0200
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-04-10 11:05 +0000
          Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-11 07:08 +0200
            Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-04-11 11:46 +0000
    Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 08:27 +0200
      Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-09 11:50 +0200
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 12:44 +0200
          About some brainwashing Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-09 14:40 +0200
          Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-09 22:52 +0200
            Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-10 07:04 +0200
              Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-10 15:39 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-10 19:35 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-10 22:41 +0200
                Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-04-10 23:52 +0200
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:46 -0700

csiph-web