Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21980
| From | deets@web.de (Diez B. Roggisch) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: configobj validation |
| Date | 2012-03-21 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m2fwd289mf.fsf@web.de> (permalink) |
| References | <4F672DBF.5060506@gmail.com> <mailman.812.1332168266.3037.python-list@python.org> |
Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> writes:
> On 03/19/2012 12:59 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
>> I seemed to remember that type validation and type conversion worked
>> out of the box, but now
>> I can't get it working anymore.
>>
>> Shouldn't this simple example actually fail the parsing (instead it
>> parses perfectly port to a string)?
>>
>> sample.py:
>> from configobj import ConfigObj
>>
>> conf = ConfigObj('sample.conf', configspec='sample.spec')
>>
>> sample.conf:
>> port = some_string
>>
>> sample.spec:
>> port = integer(0, 10)
>>
>> PS. using configobj 4.7.2
>
> I now checked the repo and configobj seems also quite dead (2 years
> ago last version), it's a pity because it's a really nice library.
> Any other alternatives for validation/configuration systems otherwise?
It works - so why do you bother? And I'm not sure about the above code -
AFAIK, validation is a two-step thing:
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles/configobj.shtml#validation
Diez
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: configobj validation Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-03-19 14:44 +0000
Re: configobj validation deets@web.de (Diez B. Roggisch) - 2012-03-21 12:40 +0100
Re: configobj validation Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 13:06 +0000
csiph-web