Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21983
| Date | 2012-03-21 13:06 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: configobj validation |
| References | <4F672DBF.5060506@gmail.com> <mailman.812.1332168266.3037.python-list@python.org> <m2fwd289mf.fsf@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.859.1332335169.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 03/21/2012 11:40 AM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > Andrea Crotti<andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> writes: > > It works - so why do you bother? And I'm not sure about the above code - > AFAIK, validation is a two-step thing: > > http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles/configobj.shtml#validation > > Diez I don't agree, if you write code that is supposed to work with Python3, using a library which is not developed and will probably never support Python3 is quite a stupid idea ;) Any other validation mechanism that can be plugged in ConfigParser for example? From what I've understood from the doc and what I remembered I thought that validation is automatically done when passing the configspec, but I'll check if the two steps work..
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: configobj validation Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-03-19 14:44 +0000
Re: configobj validation deets@web.de (Diez B. Roggisch) - 2012-03-21 12:40 +0100
Re: configobj validation Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-03-21 13:06 +0000
csiph-web