Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598018
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Geophysics is a misnomer |
| Date | 2022-12-22 09:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k0ijkfF47ooU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <k0d0t7F8j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <63A15D42.22A9@ix.netcom.com> <k0fuhgFm90vU1@mid.individual.net> <61b21cb7-3a1d-4ddf-93ce-c11881d9ebd3n@googlegroups.com> |
Am 21.12.2022 um 15:44 schrieb kellehe...@gmail.com: > Theorists, although they call themselves astronomers, basically vandalised what planets represented for the first Sun-centred astronomers as the term 'planet' represents their wandering or direct/retrograde motion in contrast to the direct motion of the Sun in ecliptic longitudes and the original Ptolemaic reference system which Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo worked off- > > "Moreover, we see the other five planets also retrograde at times and > stationary at either end [of the regression]. And whereas the Sun > always advances along its own direct path, they wander in various > ways, straying sometimes to the south and sometimes to the north; that > is why they are called "planets" [Wanderers]. Copernicus Renaissance physics is certainly not relevant anymore. Sure, we could repeat the disputes between the Pope and Gallileo, for instance. But what is that good for? Btw: I would always support Kepler in such a dispute. The reason: I had once neighbors named 'Kepler', who were the grand-grand-somethings of Johannes Kepler. That impressed me very much, and was one of the main reasons, that made me interested in physics. ... TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Geophysics is a misnomer Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-20 06:52 +0100
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:58 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 18:55 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 20:31 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 20:47 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:59 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-21 09:30 +0100
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 06:44 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-22 09:42 +0100
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 02:18 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 11:17 -0800
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Michelle Africano <nccr@amenica.he> - 2022-12-21 19:46 +0000
Re: Geophysics is a misnomer Michelle Africano <nccr@amenica.he> - 2022-12-21 23:19 +0000
csiph-web