Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #596551
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" |
| Date | 2022-11-30 22:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <juq20gFcjo3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <13d1fd81-5d12-474b-8daa-e35f9eb09781n@googlegroups.com> <juc8e5F97ifU1@mid.individual.net> <9d56d495-4fbd-4941-a525-75e3fd4f55aen@googlegroups.com> <tm8c2o$2j9tb$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2022-11-30 19:48:52 +0000, Volney said: > On 11/29/2022 10:50 AM, Ken Seto wrote: >> This is to remind you all that Model Mechanics is the only valid >> "theory of everything". > > You only need to remind us that your Idiot Model Mechanics is a > worthless pile of useless assertions. > >> I notice that there is no comment on my book, Does that mean that you >> all agree with my work? > > Typical crankspeak. "Nobody commented on my crap, so you must agree with it!" > > To others: I see that Baez's crackpot index is quite popular still, but > it's over 20 years old, and cranks have come up with many new > techniques since then. Is there any interest if I create an updated > version? Yes, do, please. We can all recognize a crackpot when we see one but it's useful to have a definition as well. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly in England until 1987.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 07:46 -0800
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 17:22 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-25 18:42 -0500
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 23:00 -0800
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 07:58 -0800
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:53 +0000
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:03 -0800
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 14:41 -0500
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 07:50 -0800
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-29 18:50 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-29 22:51 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-30 22:40 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 14:48 -0500
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-30 22:58 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-30 23:26 +0100
Re: Model Mechanics: The Final Theory" JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 12:15 -0800
csiph-web