Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586866

Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman

From whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman
Date 2022-06-12 19:46 -0500
Message-ID <jgnfmmF6c6pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <62A516B3.4EBD@ix.netcom.com> <62A5A439.6F7A@ix.netcom.com> <62A64832.51FA@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/12/2022 3:10 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I mean, really..has anyone here, there or everywhere ever recall
> Albert Einstein 'saying' he didn't have military clearance????
> 
> Did he ever said once to the effect, "I didn't have military
> clearance."?
> 
> 
> Somebody spread that lie, and yous all fell for it...for decades.


The above is a classically Dunning-Kruger response.


> Heresay.
> tittle-tattle
> 
> 
> hear·say
> /'hir?sa/
> noun
> information received from other people that one cannot adequately
> substantiate; rumor.
> synonyms: rumor, gossip, tittle-tattle, tattle, idle chatter, idle talk,
> mere talk, report, stories, tales, tidbits, bavardage, on dit,
> Kaffeeklatsch, labrish, shu-shu, buzz, the grapevine, goss, scuttlebutt,
> tea, furphy, skinder, bruit
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Here are some *facts* about Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman...
>>>
>>> They both worked for the military building bombs at the same time, and
>>> got paid the same amount $25.00 a day. They both had security clearance with
>>> the military. They both ended their bomb making work at the same time after the war ended.
>>>
>>> fact
>>> /fakt/
>>> noun
>>> a thing that is known or proved to be true.
>>>
>>
>> It appears that many subscribers of sci.physics.relativity are in some kind of cult.
>>
>> Do you think facts will deprogram them? I don't think so.
>>
>> Albert Einstein NEVER was denied any security clearance. He simply didn't want to leave
>> his home to go and work somewhere else.
>>
>> He simply chose consulting using 'liaisons' to send and receive information.
>>
>> (he used a lot of liaisons) (leo szilard was one of them)
>> (Albert Einstein told the FBI that he sees SZILARD quite frequently as SZILARD visits him to inform him as to his work on the uranium experiment.
>> Albert Einsteinsaid that the last time he had seen SZILARD was a week or ten days ago, at which time SZILARD had visited him, together with Professor EUGENE WIGNER, of Princeton University.)
>>
>> That was his MO ...modus operandi.
>>
>> "...One possible way
>>
>> of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
>>
>> who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
>>
>> capacity. His task might comprise the following:
>>
>>        a) to approach Government Departments, keep them informed of the
>>
>> further development, and put forward recommendations for Government action,..."
>>
>> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
>>
>> personal facts about Einstein: He tried to avoid trips to Washington,:
>> another possible explanation for his reluctance to travel to the Capital
>> surfaced when he declined a Navy suggestion that he come and pick up
>> some research material. ''I thank you very heartily for your kind
>> invitation,'' he wrote, ''which I shall gladly accept if the need
>> arises. Without such need, I shall try to avoid such trips, knowing that
>>   I would be very much molested by snobbish people.''
>>
>> Einstein pleaded illness to avoid a trip to Washington. ''On account of
>> the condition of my health,'' he wrote, ''it is not advisable for me to
>> go to Washington without urgent necessity.''
>> https://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/18/us/briefing-a-smart-man-indeed.html
>>
>> To put it simply, Einstein was a lazy person.
>>
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>   to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>>   the unchallengeable.
> 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 15:26 -0700
  Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-11 21:32 -0500
    Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 20:09 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-12 00:50 -0500
  Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-12 09:37 +0200
  Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-12 01:30 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-12 13:40 -0500
      Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 12:49 -0700
        Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-12 18:03 -0500
    Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-12 13:10 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-12 19:46 -0500
  Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:09 -0700
  Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-13 00:20 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-13 00:44 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein and Richard Feynman nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-13 11:19 +0200

csiph-web