Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #567055

Re: Confirm that you are not a robot...

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 17.11.2021 um 19:55 schrieb Jim Pennino:
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17-Nov-21 9:09 am, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> 9 - 3 ÷ 1/3 + 1
>>>
>>> Putting
>>>
>>> calculate 9 - 3 ÷ 1/3 + 1
>>>
>>> into Google gives the answer as 1. There is an ambiguity as to whether
>>> 1/3 should be construed as 1 divided by 3, or as the quantity one third.
>>> Google calculate takes the latter view.
>>>
>>> However, what this shows clearly is that as a test for being a robot,
>>> it's useless.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> wow, you googled the answer..dats 3rd grade cheating..shame on you miss
>> elseee.
>
> Nope, she ran it through google as a test for viablility as a robot wall
> and it failed the test.
>
> Did you not understand the sentence:
>
> "However, what this shows clearly is that as a test for being a robot,
> it's useless."
>


The term  9 - 3 ÷ 1/3 + 1
contains two different division operators.

A robot could eventually treat them as equally valid, while a human 
would see the visual difference and would think, the difference might be 
intentional.

So a human would think about  9 - 3 ÷ (1/3) + 1, while a robot 'thinks' 
  9 - (3 ÷ 1)/3 + 1, because robots usually don't try to understand 
something.

Google is certainly not a good example, because their AI is too far 
developed.


TH
>

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Confirm that you are not a robot... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-16 14:09 -0800
  Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-16 14:32 -0800
    Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-16 22:19 -0800
      Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-17 07:31 -0800
        Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 08:41 -0800
          Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-17 08:52 -0800
    Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-11-17 23:18 +0100
  Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-17 18:24 +1100
    Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 10:39 -0800
      Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-17 10:55 -0800
        Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-11-18 07:22 +0100
          Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-18 09:00 -0800
            Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:00 -0800
              Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-18 11:09 -0800
    Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2021-11-18 14:21 +0100
  Re: Confirm that you are not a robot... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 12:44 -0800

csiph-web