Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2762500

Re: China: Government Starts Phasing Out American Processors, Operating Systems on Government Computers

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/5/2024 10:46 PM, Anonymous wrote:
> On 4/5/24 1:17 AM, Richard Clayton Wieber wrote:
>> On 4/2/2024 8:34 PM, Anonymous wrote:
>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>> On 30/03/2024 3:40 pm, Anonymous wrote:
>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/03/2024 3:22 pm, Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/03/2024 11:25 am, John Larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:24:31 -0400, Governor Swill
>>>>>>>>> <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:24:46 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are different ways of being corrupt - Trump cheats different from
>>>>>>>>>>> Chairman Xi - but the aim of creating a good appearance rather than a
>>>>>>>>>>> good product is always lethal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A classic American behavior.  If it looks good, it's ok for 
>>>>>>>>>> production. Who cares if it
>>>>>>>>>> works?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People talk about bad products. There are reviews.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> State monopolies on products and information prevent competition.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But China doesn't have that. The only monopoly the Chinese Communist 
>>>>>>>> Party is interested in is it's own monopoly on political power.
>>>>>>>> Once you have absolute political power you can monetarise it, but the 
>>>>>>>> other politicians are likely to notice and object.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What's a classic statist behavior is dangerous products and
>>>>>>>>> infrastructure with criticism and deaths suppressed. Tofu dreg.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nobody in the US is making much fuss about the lethal consequences of 
>>>>>>>> Boeing's recent quality control disasters. A limited number of rich 
>>>>>>>> people controlling country isn't - technically speaking - state control, 
>>>>>>>> but it has the same defects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rich people don't rule anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dream on. In the US they don't have any explicit right to rule, but the US 
>>>>>> Supreme Court is dedicated to the idea that they should be allowed to 
>>>>>> spend as much as they like on buying influence by contributing to 
>>>>>> politicians electoral expenses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Think about why the US hasn't got universal health care.
>>>>>
>>>>> Merchants by their nature can't coordinate their varied and conflicting
>>>>> interests into a singular political force. Without the government, any
>>>>> group of merchants who form a cartel will find themselves defected upon
>>>>> by any one or more members of that cartel, and will cease to be a cartel.
>>>>
>>>> Not a credible prediction. Merchants are people, and people have lots of 
>>>> different ways of resolving and reconciling their various interests.
>>>
>>> Show us a cartel that existed for any long length of time without
>>> some form of government backing.
>>>
>>>> A cartel is a kind of government and its members have a shared interest in 
>>>> controlling their market and keeping outsiders from exploiting it.
>>>
>>> A cartel is not a kind of government.
>>
>> A cartel most certainly *is* a kind of government, 
> 
> No it's

Yes, it is, fucknozzle.

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: China: Government Starts Phasing Out American Processors, Operating Systems on Government Computers Richard Clayton Wieber <druggy.Wieber.thief@meth.whore> - 2024-04-04 22:17 -0700
  Re: China: Government Starts Phasing Out American Processors, Operating Systems on Government Computers Anonymous <anon@anon.net> - 2024-04-06 01:46 -0400
    Re: China: Government Starts Phasing Out American Processors, Operating Systems on Government Computers Richard Clayton Wieber <druggy.Wieber.thief@meth.whore> - 2024-04-06 11:15 -0700

csiph-web