Re: What should have been this NG?

From	Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com>
Newsgroups	uk.radio.amateur, uk.local.devon, uk.d-i-y
Subject	Re: What should have been this NG?
Date	2019-09-04 18:23 +0000
Message-ID	<gtado4F3c02U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<qkol1i$8oj$1@dont-email.me> <gtac9lFqiaU1@mid.individual.net> <gtad1uF36l4U3@mid.individual.net> <gtadiqF3asmU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

A. non Eyemouse <somewhere@work.invalid> wrote:
> On 04/09/2019 19:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
>> Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:25:37 +0100
>>> Queen Bean <headstone255@yahoo.com> Spouted:
>>> 
>>>> The suitable discussion taking place in the new groups.io
>>>> is what should have been this NG were it not for the
>>>> nutcases shrieking nonsense about Radio Hammery and slagging
>>>> off anyone who didn't come into the hobby the same way they did.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> WHS
>> 
>> ROLF
>> 
> 
> Hmmm.
> https://groups.io/g/RSGB-Workshop/topic/extremely_dubious_claims_by/33084278
> <jimbo>Bounce up! </jimbo>
> 

Decades of interest, allegedly. 

-- 
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Back to uk.radio.amateur | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

What should have been this NG? Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-09-04 16:25 +0100
  Re: What should have been this NG? Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-09-04 18:58 +0100
    Re: What should have been this NG? Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-09-04 18:11 +0000
      Re: What should have been this NG? "A. non Eyemouse" <somewhere@work.invalid> - 2019-09-04 19:20 +0100
        Re: What should have been this NG? Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-09-04 18:23 +0000
    Re: What should have been this NG? "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-09-04 20:24 +0100

csiph-web