Re: What should have been this NG?

From	Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com>
Newsgroups	uk.radio.amateur
Subject	Re: What should have been this NG?
Date	2019-09-04 18:11 +0000
Message-ID	<gtad1uF36l4U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<qkol1i$8oj$1@dont-email.me> <gtac9lFqiaU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:25:37 +0100
> Queen Bean <headstone255@yahoo.com> Spouted:
> 
>> The suitable discussion taking place in the new groups.io
>> is what should have been this NG were it not for the
>> nutcases shrieking nonsense about Radio Hammery and slagging 
>> off anyone who didn't come into the hobby the same way they did.
>> 
> 
> +1
> 
> WHS

ROLF

-- 
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Back to uk.radio.amateur | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

What should have been this NG? Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-09-04 16:25 +0100
  Re: What should have been this NG? Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-09-04 18:58 +0100
    Re: What should have been this NG? Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-09-04 18:11 +0000
      Re: What should have been this NG? "A. non Eyemouse" <somewhere@work.invalid> - 2019-09-04 19:20 +0100
        Re: What should have been this NG? Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-09-04 18:23 +0000
    Re: What should have been this NG? "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-09-04 20:24 +0100

csiph-web