Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #61970
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: They got me in now this |
| Date | 2017-11-02 07:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <f5uqm3FimklU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <osuu9l$m3u$2@dont-email.me> <59f32a0a$0$22558$b1db1813$7ad5c21@news.astraweb.com> <ot0ooa$4ig$1@gioia.aioe.org> <59f95670$0$26207$b1db1813$32d1605b@news.astraweb.com> <59f9dbb5$0$13033$b1db1813$814165ff@news.astraweb.com> |
"FMurtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:59f9dbb5$0$13033$b1db1813$814165ff@news.astraweb.com... > F Murtz wrote: >> Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> F Murtz wrote: >>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a >>>>>>> while,(3 gb >>>>>>> on phone wont get me far) >>>>>> >>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". It >>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much else. >>>>>> >>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not >>>>> tried >>>>> on phone. >>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus) >>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024 >>> >>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone >>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher >>> resolution than the phone. >>> >>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select >>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube >>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch >>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later. >>> >> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days, >> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as >> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data. >> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they >> said they would before the 30th. > Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds. > http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551 It was comprehensively fucked even on adsl, presumably the street cabling is a complete shambles of fucked joints and cabling.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 12:54 +1100
Re: They got me in now this Pete <pjetson@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-24 16:22 +1100
Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 17:57 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 20:05 +1100
Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:38 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 09:07 +1100
Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 13:57 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 17:26 +1100
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 19:17 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-27 02:36 +1100
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:26 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-28 14:58 +1100
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-28 19:56 +1100
Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-26 22:09 +0000
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:29 +1100
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 23:44 +1100
Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-28 02:07 +0000
Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-01 16:03 +1100
Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-02 01:35 +1100
Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:13 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 08:04 +1100
Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 10:16 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 11:48 +1100
Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 12:27 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 15:01 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:55 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:58 +1100
Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-11-02 22:00 +0000
Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 09:52 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 10:01 +1100
Re: They got me in now this keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 20:24 +1000
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-06 08:35 +1100
Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 11:13 +1100
Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:30 +1100
Re: They got me in now this Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2017-11-02 16:01 +1100
csiph-web