Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > aus.computers > #61965

Re: They got me in now this

From Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com>
Newsgroups aus.computers
Subject Re: They got me in now this
Date 2017-11-02 07:13 +1100
Message-ID <rgakvcho22d9684e7j2ode0lvjtc2uujet@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <osuu9l$m3u$2@dont-email.me> <59f32a0a$0$22558$b1db1813$7ad5c21@news.astraweb.com> <ot0ooa$4ig$1@gioia.aioe.org> <59f95670$0$26207$b1db1813$32d1605b@news.astraweb.com> <59f9dbb5$0$13033$b1db1813$814165ff@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:35:31 +1100, FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:

>F Murtz wrote:
>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". It
>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much else.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not tried
>>>>> on phone.
>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>
>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>
>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>
>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as
>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they
>> said they would before the 30th.
>
>Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
>http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551


Since you first hooked I suppose more have Copperwire is no good for
broadband

Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029
I prefer the picture
http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png
-- 
Petzl
ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens" 
*LAST*, Federal State and Council! 
Or you are voting for Islam and Sharia. 

Back to aus.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 12:54 +1100
  Re: They got me in now this Pete <pjetson@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-24 16:22 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 17:57 +1100
  Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 20:05 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:38 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 09:07 +1100
        Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 13:57 +1100
          Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 17:26 +1100
            Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 19:17 +1100
              Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-27 02:36 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:26 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-28 14:58 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-28 19:56 +1100
              Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:29 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 23:44 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-28 02:07 +0000
                Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-01 16:03 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-02 01:35 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:13 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 08:04 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 10:16 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 11:48 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 12:27 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 15:01 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:55 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:58 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-11-02 22:00 +0000
  Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 09:52 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 10:01 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 20:24 +1000
        Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-06 08:35 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 11:13 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:30 +1100
  Re: They got me in now this Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2017-11-02 16:01 +1100

csiph-web