Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017

From	"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	aus.computers, aus.comms
Subject	Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017
Date	2017-02-28 17:26 +1100
Message-ID	<ehkjgjFrunoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<o90f7e$1k6v$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ehjb5hFkkcfU1@mid.individual.net> <o927cd$uk9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <58b4cbe8$0$32630$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"SG1" <lost@the.races.com> wrote in message 
news:58b4cbe8$0$32630$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com...
>
> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:o927cd$uk9$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> In aus.computers Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>
>>>> I don't understand how Amaysim won the Best-Value Prepaid Low
>>>> Usage Mobile Plan 2017 for its Pay As You Go plan instead of Aldi.
>>>
>>> I do.
>>>
>>>> Amaysim charges 7.2c/MB whereas Aldi charges 5c/MB.
>>>
>>> Amaysim uses the entire Optus network. Aldi
>>> only has access to part of the Telstra 4G network.
>>
>> As someone who can compare both, Aldi's limited Telstra network
>> is definitely better than Optus' full network in western Victoria.
>
> Having used both, the word bargepole should be used with amaysim.

I use it all the time and you are just plain wrong, as always.

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-02-27 16:59 +1100
  Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-27 18:48 +1000
  Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-02-27 17:39 +0800
    Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-02-27 21:13 +1100
    Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 05:56 +1100
      Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-02-28 12:10 +0800
        Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-02 19:51 +1100
    Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-02 19:50 +1100
  Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 05:57 +1100
    Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-02-27 21:57 +0000
      Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-28 11:01 +1000
        Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 17:26 +1100
          Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-02 20:11 +1100
            Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 07:26 +1100
              Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-03 08:09 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:35 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2017-03-04 00:28 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 09:13 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 03:49 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 09:42 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 19:37 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-04 19:49 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-04 18:57 +1000
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 20:12 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-06 07:01 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 07:07 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 20:23 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:43 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 09:44 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-04 09:14 +1000
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 16:50 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 20:05 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 20:24 +1100
                Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 04:05 +1100
            Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:38 +1100

csiph-web