Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #59082
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.comms |
| Subject | Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 |
| Date | 2017-03-04 16:50 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ehv2tiFlbuU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <o98nkl$1lrp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <hsvgbchbl0be435m7uoerge8rb8079jl8j@4ax.com> <o9a1mb$6ut$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ehss6vFhoabU1@mid.individual.net> <o9crjl$vh3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message news:o9crjl$vh3$1@gioia.aioe.org... > > "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ehss6vFhoabU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't understand how Amaysim won the Best-Value Prepaid Low >>>>>>>>>> Usage Mobile Plan 2017 for its Pay As You Go plan instead of >>>>>>>>>> Aldi. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I do. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Amaysim charges 7.2c/MB whereas Aldi charges 5c/MB. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Amaysim uses the entire Optus network. Aldi >>>>>>>>> only has access to part of the Telstra 4G network. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As someone who can compare both, Aldi's limited Telstra network >>>>>>>> is definitely better than Optus' full network in western Victoria. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having used both, the word bargepole should be used with amaysim. >>>>>> >>>>>> I use it all the time and you are just plain wrong, as always. >>>>> >>>>>Looks like you are wrong on this one. Are you to up yourself to use a >>>>>supermarket branded telco? >>>> >>>> For me Amaysim is the cheaper option. >>>> For others ALDI maybe. >>>> >>> >>> How is it cheaper? >> >> Amaysim's $30 plan is cheaper than the aldi $35 plan if aldis $25 plan >> doesn't give you enough data. > > I am talking about low usage which is the Pay As You Go rates. OK. > I'm saying Aldi is better than Amaysim. You're wrong.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-02-27 16:59 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-27 18:48 +1000
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-02-27 17:39 +0800
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-02-27 21:13 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 05:56 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> - 2017-02-28 12:10 +0800
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-02 19:51 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-02 19:50 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 05:57 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-02-27 21:57 +0000
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-02-28 11:01 +1000
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 17:26 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-02 20:11 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 07:26 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-03 08:09 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:35 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2017-03-04 00:28 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 09:13 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 03:49 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 09:42 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 19:37 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-04 19:49 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-04 18:57 +1000
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 20:12 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-06 07:01 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 07:07 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 20:23 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:43 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 09:44 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2017-03-04 09:14 +1000
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 16:50 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2017-03-04 20:05 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 20:24 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 04:05 +1100
Re: Money Magazine Best Value Prepaid Plan For Low Users 2017 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 20:38 +1100
csiph-web