Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #54673

Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:41:33 -0500, Silver Slimer wrote:

> On 2016-11-20 6:00 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>> 
>>> On 11/20/16, 1:26 PM, in article e9ef88Fcmp1U1@mid.individual.net,
>>> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:17:27 -0500, Wolf K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-11-20 10:47, flatfish+++ wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> It's called LIEing for LIEnux and it's a tactic the Linux loons have
>>>>>> been using for years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the herd will make up some lie about Linux and wait for the
>>>>>> other herd members to come along and back him up. Or, they will
>>>>>> completely ignore the lies rather than discipline one of their own.
>>>>>> This is the technique they use with that moron 7. Rather than
>>>>>> correcting his insane lies, they either ignore them or try to explain
>>>>>> them away as "satire". Which they are not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anything to score some positive to Linux hits in Google.
>>>>>> It's a very strange culture of losers this Linux movement.
>>>>>
>>>>> The main problem with Linux is that every 'droid and his dog wants to
>>>>> customize it, and they refuse to conform to anything resembling a
>>>>> standard. "Freedom!" they yell, "it's  about freedom!". Standards
>>>>> interfere with
>>>>> freedom, you see, so of course they must be resisted. On Linux NGs
>>>>> (which I now ignore) I was targeted with spitting rage for suggesting
>>>>> that standards matter. I've seen frothing hate for Ubuntu/Mint, because
>>>>> the Ubnutu people actually want to make an easy-to-use, convenient, and
>>>>> reliable desktop Linux. Like Windows or Mac.
>>>>
>>>> I've been saying this for years, if not decades.
>>>> I do understand the FOSS philosophy and why the core leaders of the
>>>> movement are against a single "super distribution" but at the same
>>>> time Linux's biggest problem is fragmentation and no matter how much
>>>> the community squawks that most any distribution within a family, say
>>>> Debian, can be made into any other distribution, it really isn't
>>>> practical for average Jane.
>>>>
>>>> Had the Linux community pooled their resources behind a single
>>>> distribution, say Ubuntu or Redhat/Fedora, 15 years ago we just might
>>>> be running Linux now instead of Windows and even if that didn't
>>>> happen, a real threat to Microsoft's Windows desktop market would
>>>> ultimately result in a higher quality Windows system as well.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not opposed to choice but seriously 500+ different versions of
>>>> Linux is far too many and if you look at say distrowatch.org, the top
>>>> tier distributions like LinuxMint have the vast majority of hits so
>>>> average people seem to agree.
>>>>
>>>> Having more choices isn't always better.
>>>> Have more choices between high quality, bug free software *is* always
>>>> better but Linux hasn't been able to manage that yet. As you go down
>>>> the list to the less popular distributions, the quality plummets.
>>>
>>> Part of the problem with Linux is that it does NOT offer much real choice.
>>> Sure, you can have a bunch of DEs and different ways to install software.
>>> So? You end up running the same rather limited selection of apps (in the
>>> desktop space). And even then, when you have so many DEs the apps are not
>>> designed to take advantage of them all so you end up with software written
>>> for the lowest common denominator. This LIMITS workflow choices.
>>>
>>> And the "advocates" know this. It is the primary reason they freak out
>>> when I show them something BASIC on the competition like the different
>>> ways of editing a PDF and saving it as well as emailing it. Trivial on the
>>> competition and with lots of choice as to how to do it. A VERY basic task.
>>>
>>> But on Linux there is not much choice. The task is hardly difficult, but
>>> it is not streamlined, either. This is true of many EASY tasks... but
>>> whenever I show an example the "advocates" focus on that ONE example and
>>> fail to see the big picture. They tend to think in terms of machines being
>>> used for a single task... it is as if the idea of a machine being used for
>>> lots of things is just beyond their thinking.
>>>
>>> But that is what a general desktop SHOULD do... work for many tasks and do
>>> most well.
>>>
>>>>> That being said, Ubuntu/Mint is a nice distro, but unfortunately limited
>>>>> in the available software. Beyond Firefox and Thunderbird, there isn't
>>>>> much to choose from. OTOH, some people who want the (relative) security
>>>>> of Linux, dual-boot Windows (for work) and Ubuntu/Mint(for the web),
>>>>> with a common data drive/partition. Only problem: reboots. It would be
>>>>> nice to have a server OS on the machine, so you could switch between
>>>>> programs running on different OSs just as if you were switching between
>>>>> terminals. But that's another thread....
>>>>
>>>> +1 on LinuxMint. I've just installed both the Mate and kde versions,
>>>> in a VM, and compared to Manjaro which kept locking up on me,
>>>> LinuxMint is quite nice. I prefer the kde version as it has more eye
>>>> candy.
>>>
>>> I keep meaning to play with the newest Mint KDE... likely will not get
>>> much of a chance until next year, though. Right now tied up with real
>>> work.
>> 
>> "Real work"? Like doing screencasts which nobody in his right mind would 
>> endure without buying an assault weapon? Just to make certain that shite of 
>> that type is never again poured unto unsuspecting mankind
> 
> ROFL.

Gotta give Peter K credit, he's on a roll tonight :)

-- 
flatfish+++
mariana trench

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-11-17 23:19 +0100
  Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-s  software Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-11-18 00:27 +0100
  Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-17 19:25 -0500
    Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-17 19:33 -0500
      Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-17 19:43 -0500
        Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-17 20:44 -0500
      More trolls purveying "fake news" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-18 05:31 -0500
        Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:18 -0500
          Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 09:38 -0500
        Re: Propaganda "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:21 +0800
        Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-18 19:26 -0500
          Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-19 06:29 -0500
            Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-19 09:03 -0500
              Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-19 09:08 -0500
              Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-19 09:58 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-19 10:25 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-19 14:43 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-19 15:56 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-21 07:06 -0600
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-21 08:46 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-21 11:52 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-21 12:01 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-22 13:44 -0700
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-11-23 00:30 +0100
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-11-22 01:53 +0100
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-19 15:05 -0700
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201611.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-11-20 11:33 +0000
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 10:04 -0500
                Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-20 21:47 -0700
          Re: More trolls purveying "fake news" flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-19 07:50 -0500
      Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 08:08 -0500
        Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:45 +0800
          Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:46 +0800
            Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:22 -0500
              Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:29 +0800
                Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:51 -0500
                Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:55 +0800
                Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 12:03 -0500
                Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-18 12:12 -0700
                Re: Running Micro$oft Office in Linux Dr Eberhard Lisse <nospam@lisse.NA> - 2016-11-24 16:06 +0200
          Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:21 -0500
            Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:28 +0800
              Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:50 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 09:53 -0500
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:56 +0800
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 10:02 -0500
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:22 +0800
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 11:49 -0500
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 10:58 +0800
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-19 07:47 -0500
                Re: Office 2003 and big monitor "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 00:25 +0800
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 12:00 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-18 08:47 -0700
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 23:50 +0800
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-18 11:48 -0700
            Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 09:41 -0500
              Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 09:53 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 22:59 +0800
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 12:05 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-18 10:01 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 12:06 -0500
    Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 18:54 +0800
    Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-18 08:06 -0500
    Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Bob Chapman <msu79@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-19 21:56 +0000
      Fake News: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-11-19 18:56 -0500
        Re: News: Munich city considering a  move back to Windows and Office flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 09:40 -0500
      Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 09:36 -0500
        Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-20 10:40 -0500
          Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 10:47 -0500
            Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2016-11-20 12:17 -0500
              Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 15:26 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-20 15:03 -0700
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-11-21 00:00 +0100
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 18:15 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-20 16:18 -0700
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-20 16:17 -0700
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-20 18:41 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software flatfish+++ <flatfish@linuxmail.org> - 2016-11-20 18:52 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-21 07:56 -0500
                Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-11-22 02:13 +0100
              Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-11-21 07:52 -0600
  Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 18:52 +0800
  Re: Munich city planning to move back to Windows and Office from open-source software Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2016-11-18 18:34 -0500

csiph-web