Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #52748
| From | keithr <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Thoughts on router modems |
| Date | 2016-05-18 19:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dq2rvdF7pl6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <573862e1$0$3003$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> <573aada6$0$1591$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <573b1615$0$57958$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> |
On 17/05/2016 11:01 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Sandgroper wrote: >> On 15-May-16 7:51 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> Out of for instance DSL N55u, TD-W8980,or Archer D7, is the D7 worth the >>> extra, or what alternative round the same money be better? >> >> The D7 is the best bang for your buck modem to get it has AC 1750 wifi , >> a NAT size of 10,200 and 256 Mb of Ram , uses a Broadcom chipset which >> is better for long lines and costs $169 from MSY. >> >> The DSL N55u uses a Trendchip chipset that is only good for short line >> with a line attenuation of less than 35 db , it also has crappy firmware >> and is not known to be a good modem. >> >> The TD-W8980 is a reasonable good modem with dual band N600 wifi , a NAT >> size of 5200 and only 64 Mb of Ram and uses a Lantiq chipset which is >> good for long lines , however , the wifi is a bit patchy and because of >> the small NAT and amount of Ram , it is not good for any usage such as >> heavy torrenting or video streaming , but is it OK for up to 4 devices >> connected to it and for just for general browsing , emails ..... etc. >> >> You would be a lot better off getting the D7 for it's performance of the >> hardware specs and the AC wifi. >> >> If you have a all wired network , then the Billion 7800NXL is the >> best/cheapest one to get as it has a very large NAT and 256 Mb of Ram , >> but since the Billion distributor went belly up 6 months ago , then the >> only place to get a Billion modem is with PLE Computers. >> > I put my address in NBN page and it said construction has started in > area whatever that means. > Also I got a letter about a cell tower near here for wifi broadband but > I think that is coming later than FTTN. > Would the d7 be suitable for both cellular wifi and FTTN? From commencement of construction to a connection being available was a bit over 6 months here. In an adjacent area it was more like 12 months.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-15 21:51 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:41 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-16 14:25 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-16 15:08 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 15:11 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 15:19 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-16 19:21 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Sandgroper <woodbudgie@DROPKNICKERSgmail.com> - 2016-05-17 15:21 +0800
Re: Thoughts on router modems Sandgroper <woodbudgie@DROPKNICKERSgmail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:35 +0800
Re: Thoughts on router modems "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 06:01 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Sandgroper <woodbudgie@DROPKNICKERSgmail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:31 +0800
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-17 23:01 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:09 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-18 12:03 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 12:14 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-18 02:33 +0000
Re: Thoughts on router modems keithr <user@account.invalid> - 2016-05-18 19:45 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-18 20:04 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems keithr <user@account.invalid> - 2016-05-18 22:01 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-18 23:58 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 05:35 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-18 13:43 +0000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Sandgroper <woodbudgie@DROPKNICKERSgmail.com> - 2016-05-23 12:29 +0800
Re: Thoughts on router modems F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-23 17:25 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 19:53 +1000
Re: Thoughts on router modems "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 06:20 +1000
csiph-web